Similar Posts

2 Comments

  1. What does Ethica plan to do with this information other than make it public?

    The biggest issue I see in looking very quickly at these responses is the variety of "definitions" of what "ethical" ,means in adoption. This to me is the root of the issue and must be addressed. Without a definition – a clear descriptive list of specific guidelines required in order for an adoption to be ethical, it's all meaningless self-promotion, like a food product calling itself "healthy."

    Any adoption business – even agencies such WACAP who placed Artyem with Tory Hansen, or Bethany Christian which support crisis pregnancy centers that offer only one option to expectant mothers – can, and do claim to be ethical.

    Is there an agency who would say we're not ethical?

    It is incumbent to define what constitutes ethical practice, and that definition needs to go far beyond assuring transparency and accountability of funds being exchanged in exchange for children.

    For many of us, true ethical adoption cannot co0exist with any payments exchanging hands, other than basic filing fees. Any fees to support businesses reliant on the redistribution of children is too easily corruptible and reliant on coercive tactics to ensure the adoption takes place and the fee is secured.

    Towards this end, I encourage all to read:

    http://familypreservation.blogspot.com/2010/06/ca

    Mirah Riben, "The Stork Market: America's Multi-Billion Dollar Unregulated Adoption Industry"

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.